Between 12,000 and 15,000 were killed.ġ,070 people killed and 80 percent of Skopje was destroyed. Most of the deaths occurred due to landslides. 6,000 homes collapsed.Īt least 465 people were killed and severe damage along Lanao Lake.ġ58 people were killed as well as major damage was reported.Ģ8 people were killed. Soviet Union, Russian Soviet Socialist Republicīetween 2,336 and 20,000 people were killed and a tsunami with a maximum height of 18 metres (59 ft).ġ,070 people killed and US$3,570,000 in damages.ġ,243 people were killed and 5,000 injured. It is the largest earthquake on land and the largest one to occur due to continental collision rather than plate subduction. Soviet Union, Tajik Soviet Socialist Republicġ2,000 people were killed, mostly due to landslides that buried the city of Khait. Soviet Union, Turkmen Soviet Socialist Republicīetween 10,000 and 110,000 people were killed and the city of Ashgabat was completely destroyed. Also known as Bucharest earthquake.īetween 2,824 and 5,000 people were killed.īetween 300 and 4,000 people were killed. We're continuing to look at other data, and we hope we will get more GPS-acoustic data as well to figure out how the shallowest part of the fault behaves.Deadliest earthquakes by year Yearġ,000 people were killed in Romania and Moldova. We are still not sure, but now we know more than we did before about what happened in the earthquake. If the shallow part of the fault just doesn't slip in earthquakes, but instead creeps along steadily, then the risk of a large tsunami from this part of the fault is much lower. If it is, then the risk of a future large tsunami is high. Why didn't it? The reason is that most of the slip on the interface between the plates happened only on the part of the interface that was still quite deep-the earthquake didn't rupture to the seafloor or even close to it.īut we really need to know how close to the surface it got, and whether the shallower part of the fault that didn't slip in this earthquake is capable of doing so in the future. One of the interesting features of this earthquake is that it did NOT generate a large tsunami. This research helps with assessing hazard and risk. How does this research help with assessing tsunami hazard risk? So, it helps to have a larger motion to measure when the noise level is high. That means it is hard to measure the acoustic range as precisely as we can measure the GPS part. The GNSS-acoustic position measurements of the seafloor's motion are quite noisy because the speed of sound through the water is very sensitive to ocean temperature and varies a lot with time. That means a large signal for us to measure, which is always helpful. Large earthquakes are important to study because they produce the largest motions and cause the largest changes in stress within the Earth. The most important thing we learned is that the total movement at the GPS-acoustic site offshore was much larger than had been predicted by earlier models for the earthquake. Why is studying the Chignik, Alaska, earthquake important to earthquake research? This technique is called GPS-acoustic positioning, and by repeating the survey measurements before and after the earthquake, we can measure how much the seafloor moved, and use that to better determine how the fault moved. Radio signals from the GPS satellites will not travel through water, so to get any data we must combine the GPS positioning of a floating platform with acoustic, or sound wave, positioning of the same platform relative to an array of transponders, which pick up and emit signals on the seafloor. On land, we can set up Global Positioning Systems or Global Navigation Satellite Systems-GPS and GNSS, respectively-instruments and record the positions of the plates fairly easily, but the part of the fault that slipped in the earthquake is located pretty far away from land. The biggest challenge is that the fault comes to the surface on the ocean bottom far offshore, and there are kilometers of water in the way! We need to measure how the Earth was permanently moved by the earthquake, and we really need measurements that are made right above the part of the fault that slipped. What are the challenges with studying the Alaska-Aleutian fault? This research appeared recently in the journal Science Advances. Freymueller is an internationally recognized expert in geodesy, or the study of Earth's size and shape, and serves as MSU's Endowed Chair for Geology of the Solid Earth. Jeffrey Freymueller, a professor in the College of Natural Science at Michigan State University, is researching this earthquake to learn more about exactly where that slip occurred (and how much) to better understand how faults work and to help evaluate the risk of future earthquakes and tsunamis.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |